On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But I doubt skb_orphan() is the solution here, shouldn't we just > update sk->sk_wmem_alloc with skb->truesize changes? Is it worth it ? Apart from syszkaller I mean... We started with something that had a real impact on real workloads. 158f323b9868b59967ad96957c4ca388161be321 net: adjust skb->truesize in pskb_expand_head() Note that auditing the stack took me a while.
