On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varad...@oracle.com> wrote: > Just posted an RFC patch, that I'm also testing here.. > hopefully we'll se the pr_info light up, and know that the problematic > situation actually happened (I'll remove the pr_info if/when this > gets submitted as a non-RFC patch).. thanks for helping with testing > this..
But the other 2 use-after-frees happened on cp->cp_send_w. Shouldn't we cancel it as well? And cp_recv_w?
