On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:59:02 +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> The incorrect check caused an off-by-one error: the maximum VID 0xffffff
> was unusable.
> 
> Fixes: d342894c5d2f ("vxlan: virtual extensible lan")
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschif...@universe-factory.net>
> ---
>  drivers/net/vxlan.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> index 556953f53437..f89428fb7389 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> @@ -2675,7 +2675,7 @@ static int vxlan_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct 
> nlattr *data[])
>  
>       if (data[IFLA_VXLAN_ID]) {
>               __u32 id = nla_get_u32(data[IFLA_VXLAN_ID]);
> -             if (id >= VXLAN_VID_MASK)
> +             if (id & ~VXLAN_VID_MASK)
>                       return -ERANGE;
>       }
>  

"if (id >= VXLAN_N_VID)" would be cleaner and the meaning more obvious.

Thanks,

 Jiri

Reply via email to