jamal wrote: > You are attempting to change architecture (which works just fine) in the way > you > think it should work - and then point to something as a bug because it > doesnt work the way you think it should work. > This is a problem not just with you BTW, but with Patrick as well (although > he has > gotten better lately). There is a huge difference for example when dealing > with > Herbert. My approach in situations like this, which you dont have to follow, > is > to ask first what the intent was then if i dont like the intent try to > convince the > owner that there maybe better ways. Or why they are wrong.
Well, I thought I stay out of this, but since you mention me .. I also had the feeling it has gotten easier working with you lately, but I can understand Thomas's pain, I had the same thoughts more than once. Your code often does have an enormous amount of bugs and whitespace and other stylistic problems and working with you can be challenging for multiple reasons, for example having to go to endless, often entirely pointless discussions for obvious fixes, especially if you're already pissed by noticing 50 bugs at once. The reason why you might be able to work better with Herbert is IMO that he usually doesn't touch what you seem to feel is "your area". Besides that, I never changed anything in your architecture, only fixed massive amounts of bugs. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
