On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 19:14:27 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > Since the commit 0c1d70af924b ("net: use dst_cache for vxlan device") > vxlan_fill_metadata_dst() calls vxlan_get_route() passing a NULL > dst_cache pointer, so the latter should explicitly check for > valid dst_cache ptr. Unfortunately the commit d71785ffc7e7 ("net: add > dst_cache to ovs vxlan lwtunnel") removed said check. > > As a result is possible to trigger a null pointer access calling > vxlan_fill_metadata_dst(), e.g. with: > > ovs-vsctl add-br ovs-br0 > ovs-vsctl add-port ovs-br0 vxlan0 -- set interface vxlan0 \ > type=vxlan options:remote_ip=192.168.1.1 \ > options:key=1234 options:dst_port=4789 ofport_request=10 > ip address add dev ovs-br0 172.16.1.2/24 > ovs-vsctl set Bridge ovs-br0 ipfix=@i -- --id=@i create IPFIX \ > targets=\"172.16.1.1:1234\" sampling=1 > iperf -c 172.16.1.1 -u -l 1000 -b 10M -t 1 -p 1234 > > This commit addresses the issue passing to vxlan_get_route() the > dst_cache already available into the lwt info processed by > vxlan_fill_metadata_dst(). > > Fixes: d71785ffc7e7 ("net: add dst_cache to ovs vxlan lwtunnel") > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Benc <jb...@redhat.com>