From: "Cui, Cheng" <cheng....@netapp.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:14:59 +0000

> This updates tcp_acceptable_seq(), one of the oldest functions since 2.4.0, by
> preventing sending out a left-shifted sequence number from a Linux sender in
> response to a peer's shrunk receive-window caused by losing least significant
> bits in window-scaling.
> 
> RFC7323 page 10 (Chapter 2.4. Addressing Window Retraction) specifies sender
> side responsibility to handle the sequence number out of window:
>> On the sender side:
>> 
>>    3)  The initial transmission MUST be within the window announced by
>>        the most recent <ACK>.
> 
> Some related discussion can be found at the IETF [tcpm] mailing list:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/pPO7cYxtky27Qto9b30eaHB_RQI
> 
> The issue has been reproduced and the patch has been verified by scp a 20GB 
> file
> from a Linux box using kernel version 4.4.48 to a FreeBSD 11.0 box.
> 
> [ I mainly want feedback to see if everyone is OK with the approach. ]
> 
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuz...@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
> Cc: James Morris <jmor...@namei.org>
> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshf...@linux-ipv6.org>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy <ka...@trash.net>
> Signed-off-by: Cheng Cui <cheng....@netapp.com>

Patch looks fine to me, but too much parenthesis in the initial conditional and
it's easier to see to high level structure if you format the check like this;

        if (!before(tcp_wnd_end(tp), tp->snd_nxt) ||
            (tp->rx_opt.wscale_ok &&
             ((tp->snd_nxt - tcp_wnd_end(tp)) < (1 << tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale))))

THanks.

Reply via email to