On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 14:50 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> A facility like this doesn't belong in some arbitrary driver layer.
> It belongs as a generic facility the whole kernel could make use
> of.
It could, indeed. In fact, we had that discussion here before I sent
this patch in. It presumably wants to live in lib/, and acquire a more
generic name. What name will capture the uncached-read-but-cached-write
semantics in a useful fashion? memcpy_nc?
<b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
