From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
This fixes an issue reported by smatch:
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_chunk_create() warn: impossible condition '(priority == (-1))
=> (0-u32max == u64max)'
Reported-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerl...@mellanox.com>
Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Fixes: 22a677661f56 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Introduce ACL core with simple TCAM
implementation")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
---
v1->v2:
- using (~0u) as suggested by David Laight
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c
index a0a968e..7382832 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_entry_remove(struct mlxsw_sp
*mlxsw_sp,
mlxsw_reg_write(mlxsw_sp->core, MLXSW_REG(ptce2), ptce2_pl);
}
-#define MLXSW_SP_ACL_TCAM_CATCHALL_PRIO (-1UL)
+#define MLXSW_SP_ACL_TCAM_CATCHALL_PRIO (~0U)
static int
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_catchall_add(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
--
2.7.4
