From: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> This fixes an issue reported by smatch: mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_chunk_create() warn: impossible condition '(priority == (-1)) => (0-u32max == u64max)'
Reported-by: Or Gerlitz <[email protected]> Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Fixes: 22a677661f56 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Introduce ACL core with simple TCAM implementation") Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c index a0a968e..1ec3dd0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_entry_remove(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, mlxsw_reg_write(mlxsw_sp->core, MLXSW_REG(ptce2), ptce2_pl); } -#define MLXSW_SP_ACL_TCAM_CATCHALL_PRIO (-1UL) +#define MLXSW_SP_ACL_TCAM_CATCHALL_PRIO (-1U) static int mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_catchall_add(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, -- 2.7.4
