Hello. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:54:37 -0700), Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> David> Roland, there is no way in the world we would have let > David> support for RDMA into the kernel tree had we seen and > David> reviewed it on netdev. I've discussed this with Andrew > David> Morton, and we'd like you to please revert all of the RDMA > David> code from Linus's tree immedialtely. > > David> Folks are well aware how against RDMA and TOE type schemes > David> the Linux networking developers are. So the fact that none > David> of these RDMA changes went up for review on netdev strikes > David> me as just a little bit more than suspicious. > > [I'm really on paternity leave, but this was brought to my attention > and seems important enough to respond to] > > Dave, you're going to have to be more specific. What do you mean by > RDMA? The whole drivers/infiniband infrastructure, which handles RDMA > over IB, has been upstream for a year and a half, and was in fact > originally merged by you, so I'm guessing that's not what you mean. NET_DMA things. --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
