On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 03:08:11PM +0000, Mintz, Yuval wrote: > While it surely answers my question, I still don't think of an event > reoccurring 16 times a second as optimization-crucial. > Is there any reasonable scenario where the interval is > significantly smaller, or is it merely some theoretical specification?
Its theoretical, like ipv6 addresses. > [I'd like to see the machine that can handle the 2^(-128) sec interval] ;) > Again, I don't see how we can achieve that given that qede has to check > Its internal state to check whether it's right to utilize the ptp-related hw > configurations and only then call the qed function. As qed can't do it for > qede, we can't directly map qed's function into the ptp_clock_info, > but rather have to call it after taking qede's state-lock. Fair enough. Thanks, Richard
