On 27/01/17 09:24, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 27/01/17 04:10, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>>> + internal-regs {
>
> [snip]
>
>>> +
>>> + dfx-registers {
>> node label
>>
>
> [snip]
>
>>> + switch {
>> node label
>>
>
> These are peers to the internal-regs, i.e. parts of the SoC with
> mappable windows in the address space. Do they really need a label?
> Their subnodes absolutely need (and have) labels.
>Actually the pci-controller is in the same category and that has a label so I'll add one.
