Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:32:05AM CET, [email protected] wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:07:08AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Yotam Gigi <[email protected]>
>> 
>> Add a general way for kernel modules to sample packets, without being tied
>> to any specific subsystem. This netlink channel can be used by tc,
>> iptables, etc. and allow to standardize packet sampling in the kernel.
>> 
>> For every sampled packet, the psample module adds the following metadata
>> fields:
>> 
>> PSAMPLE_ATTR_IIFINDEX - the packets input ifindex, if applicable
>> 
>> PSAMPLE_ATTR_OIFINDEX - the packet output ifindex, if applicable
>> 
>> PSAMPLE_ATTR_ORIGSIZE - the packet's original size, in case it has been
>>    truncated during sampling
>> 
>> PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_GROUP - the packet's sample group, which is set by the
>>    user who initiated the sampling. This field allows the user to
>>    differentiate between several samplers working simultaneously and
>>    filter packets relevant to him
>> 
>> PSAMPLE_ATTR_GROUP_SEQ - sequence counter of last sent packet. The
>>    sequence is kept for each group
>> 
>> PSAMPLE_ATTR_SAMPLE_RATE - the sampling rate used for sampling the packets
>> 
>> PSAMPLE_ATTR_DATA - the actual packet bits
>> 
>> The sampled packets are sent to the PSAMPLE_NL_MCGRP_SAMPLE multicast
>> group. In addition, add the GET_GROUPS netlink command which allows the
>> user to see the current sample groups, their refcount and sequence number.
>> This command currently supports only netlink dump mode.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yotam Gigi <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]>
>
>Hi Jiri, Hi Yotam,
>
>this looks good to me.
>
>Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>
>I do, however, have one question: what is your feeling about allowing
>the per-action cooking which Jamal has proposed[1] to be emited as
>metadata as another PSAMPLE_ATTR_* attribute? For one thing I think it
>would allow for smooth integration with OvS user-space which makes use of a
>cookie.

Yeah, cookie could be easily added.

Reply via email to