On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:10 PM, David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > On 1/23/17 7:39 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> I'm not sure I followed what you meant. If I understood right (which >> is a big if) you're saying that ip vrf when run in a netns works >> correctly in that netns. I agree, but I think that it would continue >> to work (even more reliably) if the hooks only executed in the netns >> in which they were created. I think that would probably be a good >> improvement, and it could be done on top of my patch, but I'm not >> about to write that code for 4.10. > > Sounds like an efficiency on the implementation that does not require > limiting the code today to just init namespace. >
It's an ABI change, not an implementation change. If someone wants to make the code fully netns-aware in time for 4.10, that sounds great. I'm not going to do that.
