On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:08:31AM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > Hmmm, non-quilt style patch better?
I might have an idea what's happening -- the last context line in the patch should have been a blank line, but it's being eaten somewhere in transit. > -#define SMC_inb(a, r) readb((a) + (r)) > #define SMC_inw(a, r) readw((a) + (r)) > -#define SMC_inl(a, r) readl((a) + (r)) > -#define SMC_outb(v, a, r) writeb(v, (a) + (r)) > #define SMC_outw(v, a, r) writew(v, (a) + (r)) > -#define SMC_outl(v, a, r) writel(v, (a) + (r)) > #define SMC_insw(a, r, p, l) readsw((a) + (r), p, l) > #define SMC_outsw(a, r, p, l) writesw((a) + (r), p, l) <=== there should have been a blank line here > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Not sure what is causing this. Can you take it from here? http://www.wantstofly.org/~buytenh/smc91-diff-lpd.diff thanks, Lennert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
