Hi Vvien and Andrew,
On ven., janv. 20 2017, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 05:26:03PM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com> writes:
>>
>> > +static bool mv88e6xxx_6341_family(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
>> > +{
>> > + return chip->info->family == MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341;
>> > +}
>>
>> I don't want to see these erronous family checks anymore, but I cannot
>> blame you for adding it since not all the code is moved to ops yet ;)
If there a series about to be merged I can rebase my series on it. Else
I propose to keep it and convert the family check to ops when you will
send the series for it.
>>
>> > MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6165, /* 6123 6161 6165 */
>> > MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6185, /* 6108 6121 6122 6131 6152 6155 6182 6185 */
>> > MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6320, /* 6320 6321 */
>> > + MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341, /* 6141 6341 */
>>
>> Maybe I missed it, Andrew, can you confirm that 6341 is a proper Marvell
>> family of switch chips?
>
> My understand is that it is. Marvell have not added it to DSDT. There
> is a new SDK called UMSD, also GPLv2 and BSD. They call this family
> Topaz, and the 6390 is Peridot.
I confirm that 6141 and 6341 are called Topaz. Actually I can add the
support for the 6141 too, it is just a matter of adding an ID and maybe
removing some ops as 6141 is a subset of 6341.
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
