On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 11:03 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> sysfs is unpopular because the 'one value per file' dogma is laregly
> unsuitable for complex mulit-value atomic changes which are common in
> netdev. You can force it to work, but it is pretty horrible..
> 
> It is also very expensive if you want to shuttle a lot of data, eg I
> could not see doing something like 'netstat' for IB through sysfs

Since the RDMA sysfs ABI defines a user space ABI and since user space
ABIs must be backwards compatible removing the existing sysfs ABI is
not an option. We will need to evaluate on a case-by-case basis whether
new functionality should use sysfs or whether another mechanism should
be used.

Bart.

Reply via email to