Hello, I've noticed an inconsistency between how physical ethernet and veth handles mtu.
If I setup two physical interfaces (directly connected) with different mtu:s, only the size of the outgoing packets are limited by the mtu. But with veth a packet is dropped if the mtu of the receiving interface is smaller then the packet size. This seems inconsistent to me, but maybe there is a reason for it ? Can someone confirm if it's a deliberate inconsistency or just a side effect of using dev_forward_skb() ? Example: Using physical interfaces ================= client> ip link set dev eth0 mtu 500 server> ip link set dev eth2 mtu 1500 server> ping -qc 2 -s 600 client PING 135.15.35.74 (135.15.35.74) 1100(1128) bytes of data. --- 135.15.35.74 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.818/0.864/0.910/0.046 ms Using veth ============= server> ip netns add clientns server> ip link add name serverif type veth peer name clientif server> ip addr add 10.0.0.1/24 dev serverif server> ip link set serverif mtu 1500 up server> ip link set clientif up netns clientns server> ip netns exec clientns ip link set clientif mtu 500 server> ip netns exec clientns ip addr add 10.0.0.74/24 dev clientif server> ping -qc 2 -s 600 10.0.0.74 PING 10.0.0.74 (10.0.0.74) 600(628) bytes of data. --- 10.0.0.74 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1008ms /F
