On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 12:28 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > i, > > (Re-sending - seems like my reply was lost) > > I wanted to define this condition as narrowly as I could. I'm ok > dropping it - > I'm not sure its going to make much difference in practice. So to that end, > dropping this extra check makes sense. > > I posted this as RFC because RFC 5961, I don't think says anything about > accepting rcv_nxt - 1 in this case, so I was wondering what people > thought...
This seems a reasonable trade-off to me ( to the rescue : RFC 1122 1.2.2 )
