On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:28:06AM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 12/15/2016 9:52 AM, ira.weiny wrote: > > 2) With more than 60% of the code being MAD related, and another > significant chunk being hfi related, and only a minor bit (20% maybe?) > being net related,
Hi Doug and Ira, I may admit that I didn't read the code very deep, but from brief overview, I didn't find support for the claim the "60% code is MAD related". It looks like the opposite thing will be more accurate. Can you help me to understand this claim? How did you come to this conclusion? Thanks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
