> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joao Pinto [mailto:joao.pi...@synopsys.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2017 12:58 AM
> To: Kweh, Hock Leong <hock.leong.k...@intel.com>; David S. Miller
> <da...@davemloft.net>; Joao Pinto <joao.pi...@synopsys.com>; Giuseppe
> CAVALLARO <peppe.cavall...@st.com>; seraphin.bonna...@st.com; Jarod
> Wilson <ja...@redhat.com>; Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.tor...@gmail.com>; Joachim Eastwood
> <manab...@gmail.com>; Niklas Cassel <niklas.cas...@axis.com>; Johan Hovold
> <jo...@kernel.org>; pa...@ucw.cz; lars.pers...@axis.com; netdev
> <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; LKML <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: stmmac: fix maxmtu assignment to be within valid
> range
>
>
> Hi Wilson,
>
> Às 12:49 AM de 1/7/2017, Kweh, Hock Leong escreveu:
> > From: "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.k...@intel.com>
> >
> > There is no checking valid value of maxmtu when getting it from device tree.
> > This resolution added the checking condition to ensure the assignment is
> > made within a valid range.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kweh, Hock Leong <hock.leong.k...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > changelog v3:
> > * print the warning message only if maxmtu < min_mtu
> > * add maxmtu = JUMBO_LEN at stmmac_pci.c to follow stmmac_platform.c
> >
> > changelog v2:
> > * correction of "devicetree" to "device tree" reported by Andy
> > * print warning message while maxmtu is not in valid range
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 8 +++++++-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pci.c | 4 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > index 92ac006..ce74ae6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > @@ -3345,8 +3345,14 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
> > ndev->max_mtu = JUMBO_LEN;
> > else
> > ndev->max_mtu = SKB_MAX_HEAD(NET_SKB_PAD +
> NET_IP_ALIGN);
> > - if (priv->plat->maxmtu < ndev->max_mtu)
> > +
> > + if ((priv->plat->maxmtu < ndev->max_mtu) &&
> > + (priv->plat->maxmtu >= ndev->min_mtu))
> > ndev->max_mtu = priv->plat->maxmtu;
> > + else if (priv->plat->maxmtu < ndev->min_mtu)
> > + netdev_warn(priv->dev,
> > + "%s: warning: maxmtu having invalid value (%d)\n",
> > + __func__, priv->plat->maxmtu);
> >
> > if (flow_ctrl)
> > priv->flow_ctrl = FLOW_AUTO; /* RX/TX pause on */
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pci.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pci.c
> > index a283177..e539afe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pci.c
> > @@ -204,6 +204,10 @@ static int stmmac_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >
> > pci_set_master(pdev);
> >
> > + /* Set the maxmtu to a default of JUMBO_LEN in case the
> > + * parameter is not defined for the device.
> > + */
> > + plat->maxmtu = JUMBO_LEN;
>
> I suggest to put this configuration in one of the default config functions.
>
> Tahnks.
>
My original thought is to have one line for all *_default_data() instead of
having
multiple same line inside each *_default_data(). If this is not a big concern of
future expand, I can do that. Thanks.
> > if (info) {
> > info->pdev = pdev;
> > if (info->setup) {
> >
