On (01/02/17 17:57), Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> One more point. We should validate the tpacket_req3 input and fail if
> unsupported options are passed. Specifically, fail if any of
> {tp_retire_blk_tov, tp_sizeof_priv, tp_feature_req_word} is non-zero.
>
> Otherwise looks good to me.Ok, I'll send out v3 tomorrow, with the test case also updated to share code with walk_v1_v2_tx as cleanly as possible. Thanks for the review feedback! --Sowmini
