On 12/22/2016 06:50 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-12-22 08:53 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:07:48 +0100

Ok, you mean for net. In that case I prefer the smaller sized fix to
be honest. It also covers everything from the point where we fetch
the chain via cops->tcf_chain() to the end of the function, which is
where most of the complexity resides, and only the two mentioned
commits do the relock, so as a fix I think it's fine as-is. As
mentioned, if there's need to refactor tc_ctl_tfilter() net-next
would be better, imho.

Please, can you two work towards an agreement as to what fix should
go in at this time?

Thanks.

Thanks for fixing this!

I have a slight preference to push this patch into net as its been
tested already by Shahar and is not particularly invasive. Then for
net-next do a larger cleanup to get rid of some of the complexity per
Cong's suggestion.

My preference as well, thanks.

Reply via email to