On 2016/12/14 23:34, woojung....@microchip.com wrote:
>> I just want to commit the unregister patch and found this patch. Good job!
>> But I consider this patch may miss something.
>> If one SoC has 2 MAC ports and each port uses the different network driver,
>> the 2 drivers may register fixup for the same PHY chip with different
>> "run" function because the PHY chip works in different mode.
>> In such a case, this patch doesn't consider "run" function and may cause
>> problem.
>> When removing the driver which register fixup at last, it will remove another
>> driver's fixup.
>> Should this condition be considered and fixed?
> Good point.
> Current phy fixup is independent LIST from phydev structure,
> and, fixup runs in two places of phy_device_register() and phy_init_hw().
> It's not clear that it needs two separate fixup, but it may be good idea to
> pass phy fixup when calling phy_attach() or phy_attach_direct() and
> put it under phydev structure.
> So, fixup can be called at phy_init_hw() per phy device and remove
> When phy detached.
> Welcome any comments.
I rethink this problem and find that the "fixup->bus_id" may be a flag to
distinguish different PHY device.
In such condition, the driver should call
"phy_register_fixup/phy_unregister_fixup" directly
instead of "*_for_uid" interface.
Regards,
Dongpo
.
