On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 08:50:55PM -0400, Venkat Yekkirala wrote: > > > > Nope. It would actually overwrite the pointer, so we put it away before > > memcpy > > and set it back after memcpy. > > Right, I misread it as sptr = osk->sk_security. Still, it'd be nice to > optimise it away for the !SECURITY case.
Indeed, there should be zero overhead for core networking code when LSM is not configured. - James -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
