On Tue, 2006-20-06 at 02:54 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > jamal wrote: > > - For further reflection: Have you considered the case where the rate > > table has already been considered on some link speed in user space and > > then somewhere post-config the physical link speed changes? This would > > happen in the case where ethernet AN is involved and the partner makes > > some changes (use ethtool). > > [..] > I've thought about this a couple of times, scaling the virtual clock > rate should be enough for "simple" qdiscs like TBF or HTB, which have > a linear relation between time and bandwidth. I haven't really thought > about the effects on HFSC yet, on a small scale the relation is > non-linear.
Does HFSC not depend on bandwith? How is rate control achieved? > But this is a different problem from trying to accomodate > for link-layer overhead. > Yes it is different issue. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
