From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cas...@axis.com> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:47:15 +0100
> From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cas...@axis.com> > > From what I can tell, spin_lock(&priv->lock) is not needed, since the > phy_ethtool_ksettings_set call is not given the priv struct. > > phy_start_aneg takes the phydev->lock. Calls to phy_adjust_link > from phy_state_machine also takes the phydev->lock. ... > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cas...@axis.com> Applied, but please always be explicit about what tree you are targetting this patch by properly annotating for it in your Subject line. In this case that would be "Subject: [PATCH net-next] ..."
