On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 23:40 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Fair enough, I have no objections to the patch.
An additional question is about PATH_MAX : Is it guaranteed to stay at 4096 forever ? To be safe, maybe we should use a constant of our own.
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 23:40 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Fair enough, I have no objections to the patch.
An additional question is about PATH_MAX : Is it guaranteed to stay at 4096 forever ? To be safe, maybe we should use a constant of our own.