Hello, John! On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 11:24 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:49:54AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > > > Having two drivers supporting the same set of hardware seems pretty > > pointless to me. Plus, it confuses hotplugging/automatic detection. > > This subject comes-up from time to time. In fact, I'm pretty sure > it came-up very recently w.r.t. orinoco and hostap. > > The consensus seems to be that drivers should have IDs for all devices > they support, even if that means that some devices are supported by > multiple drivers. This leaves the choice of which driver to use in > the hands of the user and/or distro. > > If the Orinoco guys want this patch, I'll consider it. Otherwise, > I'm not inclined to take it.
I really appreciate your position in this regard. The patch in question was never submitted to the orinoco mailing list. I believe any such changes should be discussed by people using the driver and participating in its development. It's not some minor change or API update. I'm ready to consider disabling some ID's conditionally, primarily for systems that cannot use udev. But it's far from the top of my TODO list. And I'm not sure it would actually help users of desktop distributions. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
