On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 19:26:04 +0800 Jisheng Zhang <jszh...@marvell.com> wrote:
> Hi Gregory, Marcin, > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:42:49 +0100 Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > > > From: Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com> > > > > Prepare the mvneta driver in order to be usable on the 64 bits platform > > such as the Armada 3700. > > > > [gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com]: this patch was extract from a larger > > one to ease review and maintenance. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <m...@semihalf.com> > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c > > index 92b9af14c352..8ef03fb69bcd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c > > @@ -296,6 +296,12 @@ > > /* descriptor aligned size */ > > #define MVNETA_DESC_ALIGNED_SIZE 32 > > > > +/* Number of bytes to be taken into account by HW when putting incoming > > data > > + * to the buffers. It is needed in case NET_SKB_PAD exceeds maximum packet > > + * offset supported in MVNETA_RXQ_CONFIG_REG(q) registers. > > We also brought up this driver on 64bit platforms, we doesn't have this > patch. Maybe I'm wrong, I'm trying to understand why we need this > modification. Let's assume the NET_SKB_PAD is 64B, we call > mvneta_rxq_offset_set(pp, rxq, 64), > > { > u32 val; > > val = mvreg_read(pp, MVNETA_RXQ_CONFIG_REG(rxq->id)); > val &= ~MVNETA_RXQ_PKT_OFFSET_ALL_MASK; > > /* Offset is in */ > val |= MVNETA_RXQ_PKT_OFFSET_MASK(offset >> 3); > // then this will be "val |= 8;" it doesn't exceeds the max offset of sorry, this will be "val |= MVNETA_RXQ_PKT_OFFSET_MASK(8);" > MVNETA_RXQ_CONFIG_REG(q) register. > > Could you please kindly point out where I am wrong? > > > + */ > > +#define MVNETA_RX_PKT_OFFSET_CORRECTION 64 > > + > > #define MVNETA_RX_PKT_SIZE(mtu) \ > > ALIGN((mtu) + MVNETA_MH_SIZE + MVNETA_VLAN_TAG_LEN + \ > > ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN, \ > > @@ -416,6 +422,7 @@ struct mvneta_port { > > u64 ethtool_stats[ARRAY_SIZE(mvneta_statistics)]; > > > > u32 indir[MVNETA_RSS_LU_TABLE_SIZE]; > > + u16 rx_offset_correction; > > }; > > > > /* The mvneta_tx_desc and mvneta_rx_desc structures describe the > > @@ -1807,6 +1814,7 @@ static int mvneta_rx_refill(struct mvneta_port *pp, > > return -ENOMEM; > > } > > > > + phys_addr += pp->rx_offset_correction; > > mvneta_rx_desc_fill(rx_desc, phys_addr, data, rxq); > > return 0; > > } > > @@ -2782,7 +2790,7 @@ static int mvneta_rxq_init(struct mvneta_port *pp, > > mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_RXQ_SIZE_REG(rxq->id), rxq->size); > > > > /* Set Offset */ > > - mvneta_rxq_offset_set(pp, rxq, NET_SKB_PAD); > > + mvneta_rxq_offset_set(pp, rxq, NET_SKB_PAD - pp->rx_offset_correction); > > > > /* Set coalescing pkts and time */ > > mvneta_rx_pkts_coal_set(pp, rxq, rxq->pkts_coal); > > @@ -4033,6 +4041,13 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > pp->rxq_def = rxq_def; > > > > + /* Set RX packet offset correction for platforms, whose > > + * NET_SKB_PAD, exceeds 64B. It should be 64B for 64-bit > > + * platforms and 0B for 32-bit ones. > > Even we need this patch, I'm not sure this last comment is correct or not. > NET_SKB_PAD is defined as: > > #define NET_SKB_PAD max(32, L1_CACHE_BYTES) > > we have 64B cacheline 32bit platforms, on this platforms, the NET_SKB_PAD > should be 64B as well. > > Thanks, > Jisheng > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel