From: Ursula Braun <ubr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:06:32 +0100

> +static struct sock *smc_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock)
> +{
> +     struct smc_sock *smc;
> +     struct sock *sk;
> +
> +     sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_SMC, GFP_KERNEL, &smc_proto, 0);
> +     if (!sk)
> +             return NULL;
> +
> +     sock_init_data(sock, sk); /* sets sk_refcnt to 1 */
> +     sk->sk_state = SMC_INIT;
> +     sk->sk_destruct = smc_destruct;
> +     sk->sk_protocol = SMCPROTO_SMC;
> +     sk_refcnt_debug_inc(sk);
> +
> +     smc = smc_sk(sk);
> +     smc->clcsock = NULL;
> +     smc->use_fallback = 0;

This is unnecessary, sk_alloc() clears out the memory for you.

> +static int smc_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
> +                 int addr_len)
> +{
 ...
> +     smc->clcsock->sk->sk_reuse = sk->sk_reuse;
> +     rc = kernel_bind(smc->clcsock, uaddr, addr_len);

Is it valid to assume smc->clcsock is not NULL right here?

> +struct smc_sock {                            /* smc sock container */
> +     struct sock             sk;
> +     struct socket           *clcsock;       /* internal tcp socket */
> +     u8                      use_fallback : 1; /* fallback to tcp */
> +};

Please use 'bool' and true/false for 'use_fallback'.

Reply via email to