On 25/11/16 21:10, David Miller wrote: > From: Colin King <colin.k...@canonical.com> > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:02:44 +0000 > >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com> >> >> Currently if txq_info->uldtxq cannot be allocated then >> txq_info->txq is being kfree'd (which is redundant because it >> is NULL) instead of txq_info. Fix this by instead kfree'ing >> txq_info. >> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com> > > Applied, but Colin you _really_ need to start properly marking your > networking patch submissions by indicating in the subject which > tree your change is for. In this case I figured out it was > net-next, but you must say this explicitly in the Subject line > via "Subject: [PATCH net-next] ..." > > Thanks. > Understood, will do next time, apologies for that.
Colin
