On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Liyang Yu (于立洋1) <yuliya...@le.com> wrote: > Yeah，I means that recreate the tunnel again, > But I don’t think the patch can fix the bug. It only can make the first > packet received successed. And the follow packet will droped also. > In function __gre_xmit line 366 > tunnel->o_seqno++; > > If you restart from UINT_MAX, the 'o_seqno' of second packet will return to 0 > again.
The first packet after restart: o_seqno == UINT_MAX, the other end: i_seqno = 0 The second packet after restart: o_seqno == 0, the other end: i_seqno = 1 So traffic should be back to normal. UINT_MAX is also what RFC suggests.
