On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 15:37 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:

> Irregardless about the question if bonding should keep the MAC address
> alive, a MAC address can certainly change below a TCP connection.

Of course ;)

> 
> dst_entry is 1:n to neigh_entry and as such we can end up confirming an
> aging neighbor while sending a reply with dst->pending_confirm set while
> the confirming packet actually came from a different neighbor.
> 
> I agree with Julian, pending_confirm became useless in this way.

Let's kill it then ;)


Reply via email to