On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:20:58 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 18:57 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:43:55 -0800, John Fastabend wrote: > > > On 16-11-18 06:10 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > [...] > > > > > > Seem like a valid concerns to me how about num_possible_cpus() instead. > > > > That would solve problem 1, but could cpu_possible_mask still be sparse > > on strange setups? Let me try to dig into this, I recall someone > > (Eric?) was fixing similar problems some time ago. > > nr_cpu_ids is probably what you want ;)
Thank you :)
