Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > On x86, the cw1200 driver produces a rather silly warning about the > possible use of the 'ret' variable without an initialization > presumably after being confused by the architecture specific definition > of WARN_ON: > > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c: In function ‘wsm_handle_rx’: > drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c:1457:9: error: ‘ret’ may be used > uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > We have already checked that 'count' is larger than 0 here, so > we know that 'ret' is initialized. Changing the 'for' loop > into do/while also makes this clear to the compiler. > > Suggested-by: David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks. 7fc1503c906f cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395413/ Documentation about submitting wireless patches and checking status from patchwork: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
