Just got back from travelling, and am catching up.  Thanks to Andrew for
working with me via email while I was on the road, he pushed a couple
patches already for me.

Here are the netdev fixes that were in my 'Pending' folder.  I've got a
couple libata fixes to push as well, those may not come until tomorrow.

Please pull from 'upstream-fixes' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git

to receive the following updates:

 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c          |    5 +++-
 drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c             |    8 +------
 drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_dma.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Auke Kok:
      e1000: fix ethtool test irq alloc as "probe"
      e1000: remove risky prefetch on next_skb->data

Michael Buesch:
      bcm43xx: add DMA rx poll workaround to DMA4

diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c 
b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
index ecccca3..d1c705b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
@@ -870,13 +870,16 @@ e1000_intr_test(struct e1000_adapter *ad
        *data = 0;
 
        /* Hook up test interrupt handler just for this test */
-       if (!request_irq(irq, &e1000_test_intr, 0, netdev->name, netdev)) {
+       if (!request_irq(irq, &e1000_test_intr, SA_PROBEIRQ, netdev->name,
+                        netdev)) {
                shared_int = FALSE;
        } else if (request_irq(irq, &e1000_test_intr, SA_SHIRQ,
                              netdev->name, netdev)){
                *data = 1;
                return -1;
        }
+       DPRINTK(PROBE,INFO, "testing %s interrupt\n",
+               (shared_int ? "shared" : "unshared"));
 
        /* Disable all the interrupts */
        E1000_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, IMC, 0xFFFFFFFF);
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index ed15fca..97e71a4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -3519,7 +3519,7 @@ #endif
        buffer_info = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
 
        while (rx_desc->status & E1000_RXD_STAT_DD) {
-               struct sk_buff *skb, *next_skb;
+               struct sk_buff *skb;
                u8 status;
 #ifdef CONFIG_E1000_NAPI
                if (*work_done >= work_to_do)
@@ -3537,8 +3537,6 @@ #endif
                prefetch(next_rxd);
 
                next_buffer = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
-               next_skb = next_buffer->skb;
-               prefetch(next_skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN);
 
                cleaned = TRUE;
                cleaned_count++;
@@ -3668,7 +3666,7 @@ #endif
        struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info, *next_buffer;
        struct e1000_ps_page *ps_page;
        struct e1000_ps_page_dma *ps_page_dma;
-       struct sk_buff *skb, *next_skb;
+       struct sk_buff *skb;
        unsigned int i, j;
        uint32_t length, staterr;
        int cleaned_count = 0;
@@ -3697,8 +3695,6 @@ #endif
                prefetch(next_rxd);
 
                next_buffer = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
-               next_skb = next_buffer->skb;
-               prefetch(next_skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN);
 
                cleaned = TRUE;
                cleaned_count++;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_dma.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_dma.c
index bbecba0..d0318e5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_dma.c
@@ -624,25 +624,28 @@ err_destroy_tx0:
 static u16 generate_cookie(struct bcm43xx_dmaring *ring,
                           int slot)
 {
-       u16 cookie = 0x0000;
+       u16 cookie = 0xF000;
 
        /* Use the upper 4 bits of the cookie as
         * DMA controller ID and store the slot number
-        * in the lower 12 bits
+        * in the lower 12 bits.
+        * Note that the cookie must never be 0, as this
+        * is a special value used in RX path.
         */
        switch (ring->mmio_base) {
        default:
                assert(0);
        case BCM43xx_MMIO_DMA1_BASE:
+               cookie = 0xA000;
                break;
        case BCM43xx_MMIO_DMA2_BASE:
-               cookie = 0x1000;
+               cookie = 0xB000;
                break;
        case BCM43xx_MMIO_DMA3_BASE:
-               cookie = 0x2000;
+               cookie = 0xC000;
                break;
        case BCM43xx_MMIO_DMA4_BASE:
-               cookie = 0x3000;
+               cookie = 0xD000;
                break;
        }
        assert(((u16)slot & 0xF000) == 0x0000);
@@ -660,16 +663,16 @@ struct bcm43xx_dmaring * parse_cookie(st
        struct bcm43xx_dmaring *ring = NULL;
 
        switch (cookie & 0xF000) {
-       case 0x0000:
+       case 0xA000:
                ring = dma->tx_ring0;
                break;
-       case 0x1000:
+       case 0xB000:
                ring = dma->tx_ring1;
                break;
-       case 0x2000:
+       case 0xC000:
                ring = dma->tx_ring2;
                break;
-       case 0x3000:
+       case 0xD000:
                ring = dma->tx_ring3;
                break;
        default:
@@ -839,8 +842,18 @@ static void dma_rx(struct bcm43xx_dmarin
                /* We received an xmit status. */
                struct bcm43xx_hwxmitstatus *hw = (struct bcm43xx_hwxmitstatus 
*)skb->data;
                struct bcm43xx_xmitstatus stat;
+               int i = 0;
 
                stat.cookie = le16_to_cpu(hw->cookie);
+               while (stat.cookie == 0) {
+                       if (unlikely(++i >= 10000)) {
+                               assert(0);
+                               break;
+                       }
+                       udelay(2);
+                       barrier();
+                       stat.cookie = le16_to_cpu(hw->cookie);
+               }
                stat.flags = hw->flags;
                stat.cnt1 = hw->cnt1;
                stat.cnt2 = hw->cnt2;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to