> It was "just" to mimic how "tunable_type_id/ETHTOOL_TUNABLE_UNSPEC" (and > other) > is done.
Yes, i know. I'm wondering about cult cargo programming...
> The thinking was that we did not want an "ID" of zero do to anything - because
> that could mean the programmer had forgot to set the field...
Seems reasonable. Leave it as is.
Andrew
