On 16-10-31 11:57 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Mintz, Yuval" <yuval.mi...@cavium.com>
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:31:30 +0000
>
>> So I've [finally] started looking into implementing XDP
>> for qede, and there's one thing I feel like I'm missing in
>> regard to XDP_TX - what's the guarantee/requirement
>> that the bpf program isn't going to transmute some fields
>> of the rx packet in a way that would prevent the forwarding?
>>
>> E.g., can a BPF change the TCP payload of an incoming packet
>> without correcting its TCP checksum, and then expect the
>> driver to transmit it [via XDP_TX]? If not, how is this enforced [if at all]?
>>
>> [Looked at samples/bpf/xdp2_kern.c which manipulates the
>> UDP header; so I'm not certain what prevents it from doing
>> the same when checksum modifications would be required]
>
> My understanding is that the eBPF program would be responsible
> for updating the checksum if it mangles the packet in such a
> way that such a fixup would be required.
>
For XDP we will probably need to add support for at minimum the
following helpers,
bpf_l3_csum_replace
bpf_l4_csum_replace
Thanks,
John
