On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 09:18:18PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:53:09PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > Why not just use the proper pci interface? Why poke around in another > > pci device to steal an irq, when that irq might not even be valid? > > (irqs are not valid until pci_enable_device() is called on them...) > > Answered this question the last time you asked. > > Answer: this is an embedded platform that needs such poking. The > wireless device is _another_ device.
Ugh, sorry, too many patches, too many different threads... You are right... greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
