On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Neal Cardwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> >
> > Per listen(fd, backlog) rules, there is really no point accepting a SYN,
> > sending a SYNACK, and dropping the following ACK packet if accept queue
> > is full, because application is not draining accept queue fast enough.
> >
> > This behavior is fooling TCP clients that believe they established a
> > flow, while there is nothing at server side. They might then send about
> > 10 MSS (if using IW10) that will be dropped anyway while server is under
> > stress.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <[email protected]>

It's too bad the git has no history of the extra young sockets check.
it seemed to be some kind bandaid fix before syn-cookie was invented?

>
> Great. Thanks, Eric!
>
> neal

Reply via email to