On 10/26/16 12:39 AM, ido...@idosch.org wrote: > From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > > netdev_next_lower_dev() returns NULL when we finished traversing the > adjacency list ('iter' points to the list's head). Therefore, we must > start traversing the list from the first entry and not its head. > > Fixes: 1a3f060c1a47 ("net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower > devices") > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > --- > net/core/dev.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c > index f55fb45..d9c937f 100644 > --- a/net/core/dev.c > +++ b/net/core/dev.c > @@ -5419,7 +5419,7 @@ int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev, > struct list_head *iter; > int ret; > > - for (iter = &dev->adj_list.lower, > + for (iter = dev->adj_list.lower.next, > ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &iter); > ldev; > ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &iter)) { >
How about this instead? It keeps the 3 walk functions in sync modulo the rcu reference: diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index f55fb4536016..6aa43cd8cbb5 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -5400,12 +5400,12 @@ static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev, { struct netdev_adjacent *lower; - lower = list_entry(*iter, struct netdev_adjacent, list); + lower = list_entry((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list); if (&lower->list == &dev->adj_list.lower) return NULL; - *iter = lower->list.next; + *iter = &lower->list; return lower->dev; }