Hi Oliver,
I can confirm that your patch fixes the warnings for me.
Tested-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyk...@google.com>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Oliver Hartkopp
>> <socket...@hartkopp.net> wrote:
>>> if (proc_dir) {
>>> /* unique socket address as filename */
>>> sprintf(bo->procname, "%lu", sock_i_ino(sk));
>>> bo->bcm_proc_read = proc_create_data(bo->procname, 0644,
>>> proc_dir,
>>> &bcm_proc_fops, sk);
>>> + if (!bo->bcm_proc_read) {
>>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>>> + goto fail;
>>> + }
>>
>> Well, I meant we need to call proc_create_data() once per socket,
>> so we need a check before proc_create_data() too.
>
> Hmm, bo->bound should guarantee it, so never mind, your patch
> looks fine.
