On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 16:01 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: > When we reach __sk_mem_reduce_allocated() we are sure we can free the > specified amount of memory, so we only need to ensure consistent > sk_prot->memory_allocated updates. The current atomic operation suffices > to this.
Then why are you updating sk->sk_forward_alloc using racy operations ? If this is not needed or racy, do not do it. So that we can remove this annoying thing that a dynamic checker could very well detect.
