On 24/09/16 22:08, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:03:38PM -0700, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>>
>> There is an earlier check and return if err is non-zero, so
>> the check to see if it is zero is redundant in every iteration
>> of the loop and hence the check can be removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> 
> The subject and commit message are wrong. I think you copy-pasted them
> from an earlier patch.

Oops, jetlagged cut-n-paste error. I'll resend
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c | 10 +++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c
>> index 2a61617..1073673 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c
>> @@ -117,11 +117,11 @@ static int validate_filter(struct net_device *dev,
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static unsigned int get_filter_steerq(struct net_device *dev,
>> -                                  struct ch_filter_specification *fs)
>> +static int get_filter_steerq(struct net_device *dev,
>> +                         struct ch_filter_specification *fs)
>>  {
>>      struct adapter *adapter = netdev2adap(dev);
>> -    unsigned int iq;
>> +    int iq;
>>  
>>      /* If the user has requested steering matching Ingress Packets
>>       * to a specific Queue Set, we need to make sure it's in range
>> @@ -443,10 +443,10 @@ int __cxgb4_set_filter(struct net_device *dev, int 
>> filter_id,
>>                     struct filter_ctx *ctx)
>>  {
>>      struct adapter *adapter = netdev2adap(dev);
>> -    unsigned int max_fidx, fidx, iq;
>> +    unsigned int max_fidx, fidx;
>>      struct filter_entry *f;
>>      u32 iconf;
>> -    int ret;
>> +    int iq, ret;
>>  
>>      max_fidx = adapter->tids.nftids;
>>      if (filter_id != (max_fidx + adapter->tids.nsftids - 1) &&
>> -- 
>> 2.9.3
>>

Reply via email to