On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 02:53:53PM +0800, [email protected] wrote: > From: Gao Feng <[email protected]> > > It is valid that the TCP RST packet which does not set ack flag, and bytes > of ack number are zero. But current seqadj codes would adjust the "0" ack > to invalid ack number. Actually seqadj need to check the ack flag before > adjust it for these RST packets.
Applied, thanks.
