Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:25:16PM CEST, eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 07:11 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 15:39 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >> > I see. So how to silent the warning? >> > >> >> We can replace the atomic_add_return() and use a loop around >> atomic_read() and atomic_cmpxhg() >> >> This would change the nice property of x86 xadd into a loop. >> >> Or we also could fallback to random generation if the atomic_cmpxchg() >> fails. >> >> I'll provide a patch, thanks. >>
I'm going to test your patch now. > >I looks at other places, I am surprised you do not see other UBSAN >issues in networking :) Not yet :) > >netdev_refcnt_read() can potentially gives errors as well. > > >