On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:58:58 +0300 Tariq Toukan <tar...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> + act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, &xdp);
> + switch (act) {
> + case XDP_PASS:
> + return false;
> + case XDP_TX:
> + consumed = mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame(&rq->channel->xdp_sq, di,
> + MLX5_RX_HEADROOM,
> + len);
> + rq->stats.xdp_tx += consumed;
> + return consumed;
> + default:
> + bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
> + return false;
This looks wrong. According to the specification[1] and comment in the
code /include/uapi/linux/bpf.h: "Unknown return codes will result in
packet drop"
> + case XDP_ABORTED:
It is not clearly defined, but I believe XDP_ABORTED should also result
in a warning (calling bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act)).
> + case XDP_DROP:
> + rq->stats.xdp_drop++;
> + mlx5e_page_release(rq, di, true);
> + return true;
> + }
I've started documenting XDP[2], as this patch clearly shows there is a
need to have a specification, given already the second driver
supporting XDP gets these details wrong.
[1]
https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/networking/XDP/implementation/xdp_actions.html#xdp-aborted
[2] https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/networking/XDP/index.html
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
