On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Kenneth Klette Jonassen
<kenne...@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>> +static u64 bbr_rate_kbps(struct sock *sk, u64 rate)
>> +{
>> + return bbr_rate_bytes_per_sec(sk, rate, BBR_UNIT) * 8 / 1000;
>
>
> Consider div_u64() here to keep all builds happy. :-) This adds __udivdi3()
> with the nxp powerpc toolchains I'm using.
>
> (Or have the one caller use bbr_rate_bytes_per_sec() instead.)
Thanks, Kenneth. We will fix this in the next revision (we like your
suggested approach of just using bbr_rate_bytes_per_sec()).
cheers,
neal
