> Hi Andrew, > > this function does indeed duplicate the functionality of > phy_ethtool_get_eee() with the small difference, that e->eee_active is > also set which phy_ethtool_get_eee() does not set. > > dsa_slave_get_eee() will call phy_ethtool_get_eee() right after the > get_eee() op has been called. would it be ok to move the code setting > eee_active to phy_ethtool_get_eee().
Hi John I think that is a question for Florian. Andrew
